Discussion about this post

User's avatar
JustPlainBill's avatar

Publishers of eBooks can (and do) reach out and change the copies of books already in users' possession, or even unilaterally "take them back." I knew I had read about this being done by Amazon, and a search uncovered the following interesting article describing the legal basis for this at https://www.zdnet.com/article/why-amazon-is-within-its-rights-to-remove-access-to-your-kindle-books/

No one reads the fine print in all these "user agreements" (written in legalese and often dozens of pages long), but their legal right to do this is enshrined in there somewhere. It is annoying that despite not legally owning an eBook, it can often be priced at (or even above!) the price of a printed copy. If for no other reason, this seems wrong, given that the cost of producing an eBook is significantly lower.

In addition for the reasons you offer, I also personally prefer the experience of reading a hard copy to reading an eBook, and will generally go that route unless the price of the eBook is WAY lower. But on those few occasions when I do purchase an eBook, it is easy enough to immediately strip off the DRM and store a copy in a separate file using something like Calibre eBook management software. That way you can protect it from being yanked or edited, and can read it on any device you choose without registering the device with companies who want to "reach out" and fiddle with the content.

Of course, the absence of DRM puts users on the "honor system" with respect to sharing it with others who have not purchased it. And yet many authors trust their readers to do this--I have bought a few that explicitly state they are being provided without DRM. I always appreciate and respect that trust.

Expand full comment
noah olsen's avatar

Great insight, very concerning though and I wish I hadn’t read this!

Expand full comment
23 more comments...

No posts